Do you remember these Windows Systems? A nostalgic look at Windows. : Speckyboy - Web Design, Web Development and Graphic Design Resources

Currently Reading: Do you remember these Windows Systems? A nostalgic look at Windows.

Do you remember these Windows Systems? A nostalgic look at Windows.

February 16, 2008 - Categories: Nostalgia, Operating Systems, Windows.

I was given a pc a while back that had Windows 95 preinstalled, to be honest I never had a PC that far back, I had started out on a Mac. So it was a bit of an eye opener seeing this ancient system, to say the least. My first Windows was ME(Millenium), that came installed on the cheapest, and to be honest, the worst PC I have ever bought. How I stayed with Windows after using ME, I’ll never know, thankfully XP came along.
Anyway, back to this article, having seen Windows 95 working, my curiosity got the better of me and went looking for other Windows Systems. The difference in the desktops across all the systems is amazing, the low specs make you wonder how we survived, truelly the advances in Windows in over 20 years is staggering.

Love them or loathe them Microsoft Windows are certainly here to stay, and they have no doubt helped in the advancement of technology in recent years, as well as opened up computing to everyone from a 5 year old to the 75 year old. (I still love my MAC, as well).

Below are a chronological list of all Windows Operating Sysyems, and all specs and a couple of facts. This will make you feel nostalgic.

Windows 1.01 (1985)

Name: Windows 1.01.
Year Released: 1985.
System Requirements: CGA/Hercules/EGA, MS-DOS 2.0, 256 KB RAM, and 2 double-sided disk drives or a hard drive.
Still Supported? No, support ended in 2001.
Info: It included device drivers for video cards, mouse, keyboards, printers and serial communications. Windows 1.0 was designed to be a total operating system, rather than being just a graphics environment used by applications. Windows 1.0 1 could not operate without DOS.

Windows 2.03 (1987)

Name: Windows 2.03.
Year Released: 1987.
System Requirements: MS-DOS version 3.0, two double-sided disk drives or a hard disk, 512K of memory or greater and graphics-adapter card.
Still Supported? No support.
Info: This was the first the time the terms ‘minimize’ and ‘maximize’ in relevance to lowering or fully enlarging a window, also the first Windows that allowed you to overlap the windows and not tile them like Windows 1.

Windows 3.1 (1992)

Name: Windows 3.1.
Year Released: 1992.
System Requirements: MS-DOS 3.1 or later, IBM compatible 80286 or higher (386 recommended), 640K Conventional memory, 256K extended memory (XMS v 2.0 or higher), 1024K extended memory recommended on 80286, 2048K extended memory recommended on 80386, 5.25-inch (high density) or 3.5-inch floppy drive, fixed drive with 6 megabytes free (10 megabytes recommended), EGA, VGA, SVGA, XGA, 8514/A, or Hercules video card or 100% compatible card, and monitor, mouse recommended.
Still Supported? No support.
Info: First windows to have compatabilty with previous versions of Windows, it had a File Manager and a Program Manager installed for the first time (just like my 2007 Nokia phone!!!), the truetype font added a seriously professional look that we are now used to in modern operating systems.

Windows 95 (1995)

Name: Windows 95.
Year Released: 1995.
System Requirements: 386DX or higher processor (486 recommended), 4 megabytes (MB) of memory (8 MB recommended), hard disk space required for upgrade: 35-40 MB, hard disk space required to install on a clean system: 50-55 MB, 3.5-inch high-density floppy disk drive and VGA or higher resolution (256-color SVGA recommended).
Still Supported? No support.
Info: This operating system broke all boundaries, from the graphical interface to application support to consumer usability. It hit the mainstream because of its ease of use, and pocketed Microsoft a hell of a lot (making them far too powerful, we can only blame ourselves). Windows Update was introduced, Internet Explorer was at version 4 (I wonder how CSS would look on this), we also seen for the first time the Start button and Taskbar, a feature we have now came to expect from all operating systems. It wasn’t until 1997, with Windows Update, that 95 supported USB.

Windows 98 (1998)

Name: Windows 98.
Year Released: 1998.
System Requirements: 486DX 66 megahertz (MHz) or faster processor (Pentium central processing unit recommended), 16 MB of memory, 195 MB of free hard drive space, 3.5-inch high-density floppy disk drive, VGA or higher resolution (16-bit or 24-bit color SVGA recommended).
Still Supported? No, support ended on july 11th, 2006.
Internet Explorer Version: 4.
Info:This was a little more polished version of Windows 95, it had: improved USB support, the better Internet Explorer 5, Internet Connection Sharing, which allows multiple computers on a LAN to share a single Internet connection through Network Address Translation, integrated support for DVD-ROM drives. Plug and Play was first introduced (how we take things for granted). Pre-installed programs included: Disk Defragmenter, Msconfig, Sysedit and ScanDisk.

Windows 2000 (1998)

Name: Windows 2000.
Year Released: 2000.
System Requirements: Pentium Processor at133 MHz or greater, at least 32 MB of RAM, 650 MB of hard drive space, and a CD-ROM drive (recommended: Pentium II, 128 MB of RAM, 1 GB of hard drive space, and CD-ROM drive).
Still Supported? No, support ended on july 11th, 2006.
Internet Explorer Version: 5.5 up to 6 after an upgrade.
Info: There were 4 editions of Windows 2000 released: Professional, Server, Advanced Server, and Datacenter Server. Each tailored to s specific customer, primarily to the business user. Version 7.0 of DirectX came pre-installed, device manager was also first seen, as was the Recovery Console and Internet Explorer reached version 6 (we all, really, love that one).

Windows ME (2000)

Name: Windows ME.
Year Released: 2000.
System Requirements: Minimum: 150 MHz Pentium or compatible processor, 320 megabytes of free hard drive space and a minimum of 32 megabytes of RAM. Recommended: Pentium II 300 MHz with 96 megabytes of RAM and 2 gb of free hard drive space. (Windows Me Setup application features an undocumented “/nm” switch which tells setup to ignore hardware requirements).
Still Supported? No, support ended on July 11th, 2006.
Internet Explorer Version: 5.5.
Info: Windows ME had a short life of only a year, it was bloody awful. Overall it was ranked the worst Microsoft OS release. Applications that needed DOS wouldn’t run on ME, it had instal problems, hardware or software wouldn’t run well or at a all, and getting it to stop running. It was unstable and unreliabe, due to its crashes (the Blue Screen.

Windows XP (2001)

Name: Windows XP.
Year Released: 2001.
System Requirements: Minimum: 233 MHz processor, 64 MB RAM, Super VGA (800 x 600), 1.5 GB of free hard drive space, cd-rom drive, mouse and a keyboard. Recommended: A processor of 300 MHz or higher and 128 MB RAM or higher.
Still Supported? Yes.
Internet Explorer Version: 6 up to 7.
Info: Windows XP was/is a more stabile and efficient versions of Windows. The graphical interface was redesigned, it was more user-friendly than previous versions of Windows. It could run older programs with its ‘Program Compatabilty Wizard’ which allowed for an almost seamless instal/upgrade. There are many versions of XP : Home, Proffesional, Media Center, 64 bit and Tablet. It is the most widely supported version of Windows, not only from Microsoft but also from third parties. There were 3 major Service Packs released (SP1, SP2 and SP3), which greatly improved security and usability. Being the most popular OS ever this opened it up to many security issues and attacks from hackers. Overall this was a great leap for Microsoft after Windows ME, it shows how popular and succesful XP was by the fact it took 6 years before a new OS arrived with Vista.

and finally to… Windows Vista (2007)

Name: Windows Vista.
Year Released: 2007.
Info: This is still a young OS, and too soon to judge it. Of course it is going to be flawed, but I think given an another year this will be the best OS yet (well, it has the potential).

Blue Screen of Death (1992 - 2008)

Name: Blue Screen of Death.
Year Released: 1992.
Info: Not an Operating System, but I have seen it enough to make me think it was. Everyone has experienced this, truelly the worst thing you can see in computing…The dreaded Blue Screen of Death. Causes ranged from device drivers, faulty memory, a corrupt registry, an incompatible Dynamic-link library (DLL), the computer overheating…by blowing on it, by turning on your PC, by looking at the monitor…seemingly anything. In fairness I haven’t seen it in XP, even though some have.

Leave your Comment here

Write your comment below.

17 Comments so far

Norswap on February 17, 2008 4:31 am

Vista best OS ? Seem you didn’t have one !
My sister has Vista on her PC (which is better than my laptop) and still it runs at least 3 times slower. Also it causes numerous problems everywhere.
I’d say it’s nearly as bad (if not more) than Windows Me. I’m definitely staying with XP until Windows Seven or switching to an Hackintosh.
Kyle James on February 17, 2008 7:11 am

Thank you for the trip down memory lane. Great and simple look back. Man we have come a long way!
Rhett on February 17, 2008 2:56 pm

I wish I could say that they’ve come a long way. To shut down the computer you still need to click a button named ‘Start’
Web Design Manchester on February 18, 2008 1:37 am

I can honestly say i remember using everyone of those systems like it was yesterday. Before web design my background was in technical so i suppose when you tweak them day in day out it kind of stains your brain….

Gonna leave vista alone for another 6 months at least and wait till its a little more stable on its feet… a bit like XP in the early days.

Nice list…!
Pully on February 20, 2008 3:01 pm

Nice sum up.

The Blue Screen of Death was my nightmare last year. My laptop run on Win XP and it was overheating every time I turned it on. After a minutes or so, the Blue Screen of Death will appear and shut down the entire thing. It was driving me nuts. I got it fixed it hasn’t appeared anymore, and I hope not, at least not until I can afford a new one.
AmeyJah on March 6, 2008 5:31 am

Really good information about older Microsoft OS. First time, I bought 386 computer with older DOS which used to take 10 mins to load to c prompt. And Slowly, I wen to upgrading system which now boots vista in less than 1 mins.
Jimi on April 18, 2008 6:36 pm

Its facinating looking back at all those different evolutions of windows. I have work on and supported them for years. I agree with you, I think Vista has the potential to be one of the bests. This is coming from a person who (normally) fancies Linux above Microsoft products.
TinyVista on August 28, 2008 10:16 am

If vista is slow then try TinyVista!
Note:Not a microsoft thing - Search Google For It!
Richard on October 3, 2008 4:56 am

While I do like Windows XP as it’s the most stable, I think Windows 98 would have to be the most “fun” of the Windows OSes. Took some of the .wavs from 98 and put them to work in XP. They remind me of the good old days.

Currently Reading: Do you remember these Windows Systems? A nostalgic look at Windows.

Windows 1.01 (1985)

Windows 2.03 (1987)

Windows 3.1 (1992)

Windows 95 (1995)

Windows 98 (1998)

Windows 2000 (1998)

Windows ME (2000)

Windows XP (2001)

and finally to… Windows Vista (2007)

Blue Screen of Death (1992 - 2008)

Leave your Comment here

17 Comments so far

Trackbacks

Want to Subscribe?

Looking for Something?

Some Ads

Navigation

Archive Pages

Archives

Worthy Links

Categories

Latest Reader Submitted Resources

Top 10 Articles

Latest Speckyboy Articles