• http://iamautocomplete.com angelee

    Great read and tips. There are lots of awesome websites designed in a minimal approach that gives good benefits to the designer and to the user.

    I think the guy in the third image went crazy cos he’s sick of putting out few elements and all.. He really looks funny..

  • coachella

    I think only the first reason applies.

    The rest is all dependend on the designer’s taste and skills and the purpose of the website and its target audience.

    I like the minimalism bragging rights though :)

  • http://www.spo-inc.com Steve Pinkston

    I think the all are true, but content must be concise and extremely communicative for minimalism to be effective. In the visual clutter of our day to day lives, it can be used effectively to get attention. However, if the communication is not successful, then the effort is lost.

    Also, I find it ironic that we are talking about minimalism in a format that allows the clutter of ads in the right column. He who screams the loudest doesn’t deserve my attention.

    I’m a fan.

  • http://facilethings.com/blog/en/ Francisco Sáez

    Well, I’m not sure minimalism means “easier” and “faster”. You have to think a lot about what are you going to leave out and how are going to do that.

  • http://www.devctrl.net Jassen

    Awesome article… I have been a huge fan of minimilist design for a long time, so much easier to read, navigate, and looks so much cleaner than over produced ‘Web 2.0″ sites…

    Nice Job!

  • http://www.danielcollinsdesign.com DC

    They are NOT easier to create, nor do they take less time. Trust me ;-)

  • http://hellofisher.com Steve Fisher

    I totally agree with DC. Saying that minimalism is easier is completely wrong. Great design thinking distills things down to their essence.

  • http://www.kevonpowell.ca Kevin Powell

    Good minimalist design shouldn’t be easier or faster. Just because there is less on the page doesn’t mean a lot of thought doesn’t go into what should be included and what can be left out, as well as taking the time to properly balance everything.

    I think faster / easier is one of the greatest misconceptions of (good) minimalist design.

  • Pingback: Bruno Moura » The Beauty of Minimalist Design: 5 Reasons to Include Less

  • http://aprillins.com aprillins

    minimalism design reduces bytes out of website..

  • Andrei Gonzales

    Anyone who thinks minimalism is easier and faster to do doesn’t know how to do it / has never done it properly.

  • http://twitter.com/Drei_Gonzales Andrei Gonzales

    Minimalist design is one of the hardest and most time-consuming to pull off properly. Every REAL designer knows that.

    • http://www.balcora.org Ian Miles

      Please “Oleg” Read this man.

  • Vin Sullivan

    Sorry, but this article really is full of flaws and half-truths.

  • Ryan

    Sorry Oleg Mokhov but this is an awful article, Minimal design is most certainly not easier or faster and if you’re doing it for bragging rights then you’re doing it wrong.

  • Daniel

    Apologies, but I think this is probably one of the worst articles I have ever seen written on design, and I can’t agree with any points made here at all.

  • http://nathanhangen.com Nathan Hangen

    Note: I’m a card carrying member of the anti-minimalist movement, so take my opinion for what it’s worth, but…

    Perhaps minimalist design could be broken down into two subcategories:

    1. Minimal = Simple

    For example, my website is simple, has no fancy graphic elements, no fancy scripts, and no fancy layout. It’s basically a home page with some text, blah, blah, blah.

    This was simple, yet quick.

    2. Minimal = Bare Elements

    This is the more complex version. This is building something complex, and then stripping it down to the bare essentials. This is Steve Jobs. This is Cameron Moll.

    This is interface, navigation, line of sight, hierarchy. I agree, this is neither easy nor quick.

    Maybe that’s what was meant here?

    • http://blog.struktur.ca Colin

      Minimal does NOT = Simple.
      Minimal does NOT = Bare Elements.

      Please stop misleading people with the careless interchanging of these terminologies.

      To say that something is minimal just because it is bare, or appears simple, fails to take into account what minimal design’s purpose is.

      The purpose of a minimal design is to display content in such a manner that no element distracts attention from the visual hierarchy.

      The purpose of a minimal design is not to achieve simplicity in specific, although the goal of every design should be to arrive at some sort of visual balance that is not deemed to be excessively over-decorated.

      Every element in a minimal design should be carefully considered, and good minimal design is not just slapped together with the intention that it appears bare or empty and simple as the end result.

      Perfect example is this site here:

      http://designobserver.com/

      Hardly ‘bare’ and hardly ‘simple’ by conventional standards. I don’t see how someone can so carelessly interchange terms witch don’t mean the same thing, especially when they claim to be against this sort of design altogether. Please research the topic further if you plan to speak on what it is or isn’t.

      This whole idea that minimal designs are simply built in a complex manner, and then stripped down to the bare essentials is as silly as anything I’ve ever heard in terms of design myths.

      • http://nathanhangen.com Nathan Hangen

        Sorry, but I think we’re talking about different things here, and I can’t really speak to you until you step down from your pulpit.

        The site you linked looks like a 4 column WP template that I could find in the theme repository.

        Also, these articles disagree with you:

        http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/05/13/principles-of-minimalist-web-design-with-examples/

        http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2009/12/minimalist-web-design-when-less-is-more/

        http://www.minimalistdesign.org/showcase/web-design

        there are many more.

        • http://blog.struktur.ca Colin

          What pulpit? Didn’t you say you were a card-carrying member of the anti-minimalism movement?

          First off, Design Observer looks like a template? You clearly fail to have a true understanding of the subject matter. This is why we’re talking about two different things. You’re talking about a certain aesthetic which you perceive to be minimalism, which is your first problem. I’m talking about minimal design and its core principles. Maybe this is why you are referring to things that have no direct relation to minimal design, and how a minimal design is achieved? You said it yourself, you don’t subscribe to the ‘movement’…

          Next off, neither Smashing Mag or WDD is minimalist, though they seem to try to capitalize on the so-called ‘trend’ as often as they can, as Speckyboy’s writers have so poorly done this time around.

          Is Web Designer Depot anywhere near minimal in your mind? Why would you quote a sign that in no way represents minimal design, as a source of authority or credibility on the topic? Sorry my friend, but you’ve failed…

          And since we’re talking about sites that looked templated, how about your’s? Was your comment on Design Observer supposed to be offensive? Templated or not, it is complex and not bare, and that was the idea behind me posting the link. It seems like you’re tossing stones from a very thin glass house there, mate.

          • http://nathanhangen.com Nathan Hangen

            I don’t really have a dog in this fight, so I’m not going to argue over semantics, but it has been an interesting discussion nonetheless.

            I quoted articles, not websites, sorry for the miscommunication there.

            My site is indeed a Squarespace template, but I don’t sell design services.

            Anyway, the design of The Studio book is fantastic. I did it. Wishing you the best.

            Nathan

            • http://nathanhangen.com Nathan Hangen

              Sorry, that was supposed to say “I dig it” not “I *did* it.”

      • http://twitter.com/bingojackson Rhys Thomas

         Take a look at that site again, that you say is a perfect example, and look where everything lines up. Then say again that it’s perfect. With a straight face.

        I leave myself open to massive levels of troll like criticism on my unfinished website, but at least I’m trying,

  • http://mtness.net mtness

    What one tends to forget easily is that minimalism is in itself only another style type.

    Kind regards, mtness.

  • http://www.lahive.co.uk lahive

    Minimalism is so easy to get wrong and certainly not easier or quicker.

  • Pingback: Cinco razones para aplicar los principios del minimalismo en el diseño web - Diseño Web

  • http://smartuts.com smartuts

    most commentator here agree that it is not easier & faster to make an efficient minimal design. me too

  • Pingback: A Look at Minimalism (part 2) – In Transition

  • Pingback: A Look at Minimalism (part 1) – In Transition